Challenges of Nation-Building Notes

New Nation’s Challenges

Following India’s independence in August 1947, three challenges arose in nation-building. 

  • The first and most pressing challenge was to create a cohesive country to accommodate society’s diversity and eradicate poverty and unemployment. 
  • The second obstacle was establishing democracy. 
  • Third, ensuring the development and well-being of the entire society was a challenge. 

Displacement and Rehabilitation

  • India and Pakistan became nations on the 14th and 15th of August, 1947. 

Thousands of people on both sides lost their homes, lives, and property due to enmity. 

  • West and East Pakistan sprang up along the Muslim-majority belt, separated by a large swath of Indian territory. 
  • “Frontier Gandhi,” Khan Abdul Gaffar Khan, was the undisputed ruler of the North-West Frontier Province (NWFP). Despite his protests, Pakistan merged with the NWFP. 
  • During partition, Punjab and Bengal were part of the trauma. 

Partition Effects 

  • One of the most abrupt, unplanned, and tragic population transfers occurred in 1947. 
  •  Minorities on both sides of the border fled their homes and sought temporary refuge in “refugee camps.”
  • Women were frequently abducted, raped, attacked, and killed. They had to change their religions. 
  • The political and administrative machinery of both sides failed. 
  • There was a significant loss of life and property. The culmination of communal violence had arrived.

Princely State Integration

  • During British rule in India, there were two types of provinces: British Indian Provinces (Governed directly by the British Government) and Princely States (governed by Indian princes).
  • There were nearly 565 princely states immediately following independence. Many of them joined the Indian Union. 
  • Initially, Travancore, Hyderabad, Kashmir, and Manipur refused to join the Indian Union. 

The Government’s Strategy

  • The interim government at the time took firm measures to prevent India from being divided into small principalities of varying sizes. 
  • Three considerations guided the government’s approach. 
  • The people of the majority of the princely states desired to join the Indian Union. 
  • The government was willing to be flexible in granting autonomy to regions. 
  • The nation’s territorial boundaries had become critical.

Adherence Instrument 

  • The rulers of the majority of the states signed a document known as the “Instrument of Accession.” The accession of Junagarh, Hyderabad, Kashmir, and Manipur proved more than any others. 
  • Following initial opposition, Hyderabad was merged with the Indian Union through a military operation in September 1948.
  • In September 1949, the Government of India succeeded in pressuring the Maharaja of Manipur into signing a Merger Agreement. The government did so without consulting Manipur’s popularly elected Legislative Assembly. 

Reorganization of the State

  • During the national movement, the Indian National Congress recognized the need for linguistic reorganization of states. 
  • This idea was put on hold after independence because the memory of partition was still fresh and the fate of the Princely states had not been decided. 
  • Andhra Pradesh became a linguistic nation in December 1952 following a lengthy battle. 
  • The establishment of this state provided the impetus for the linguistic reorganization of states. As a result, in 1953, the Indian government formed the States Reorganization Commission. 
  • This commission agreed that the state’s borders reflect the limits of various languages. 
  • Based on its recommendations, the State Reorganization Act took effect in 1956. As a result, 14 states and six union territories came into existence.