Cities to be taller as Plan panel seek Higher Floor Space Index.

The skyline of Indian cities could soar as the government considers permitting vertical growth with the aim of checking runaway realty prices and generating resources to upgrade urban infrastructure for future growth. A Planning Commission steering committee, in its draft report, has recommended providing additional FSI (floor space index; the ratio between built-up area and plot size) as development rights, but said it should not come free of cost.

The panel said the charges for additional FSI and land-use conversions should be at least 50% of the circle rate in the area and should be determined professionally. It added that additional FSI should be permitted selectively.

The commission’s steering group on urbanization said the revenue from grant of additional FSI should be “suitably ring-fenced for funding infrastructure projects to sustain higher FSI”. “The proposals, if accepted, would substantially increase availability of housing stock and moderate realty prices,” said an urban development ministry official.

Calling the present density regulations in Indian cities “archaic”, the report noted that Indian cities had the lowest FSI in the world. “This (densification) should be part of a balanced strategy for expanding the effective supply of prime land and, in the process, raising funds to finance urban infrastructure improvements,” the committee noted.

The Centre should introduce incentives that encourage states and cities to pursue densification strategies for future urban development, it said. Many cities were already levying such charges for additional FSI in some form or the other, it noted. Hyderabad, for instance, has a ‘city level impact fee for high rise buildings’ and Ahmedabad has systematically been selling a limited amount of additional FSI.

The committee said higher FSI should go hand in hand with provisions such as amalgamation of plots to make housing more affordable. Rather than the current practice of having a blanket FSI across a city, the panel wanted mixed land use promoted through the concept of granular FSI. “Densification with mixed land use as a planning strategy needs to be followed by the authorities to accommodate future urbanization needs,” said a ministry official.

Real Estate Sector: A look at urban investments in Mumbai.

India’s growth story has many facets; one of the integral parts of growth – and arguably the most important one – is urbanization. In fast-growing economies, cities are significant investment and employment generators, which in turn carry the growth momentum forward. The sustainability and liveability of any city depends largely on the quality of its infrastructure and real estate stocks. Needless to say, cities also require large sums of money to create urban asset stocks, including buildings and infrastructure.

Over last decade, India’s population grew by 18% while its urban population grew at almost double that rate (at 32%). Currently, about 31.2% of India’s population lives in urban areas. The country’s share of urban population has increased by almost 3.5% over the last decade. What is even more astounding is the increase in the built-up real estate stock in its cities and towns.

Data from the 2001 census shows that about 110 million ‘Census Houses’ exist in the urban areas, which indicates an increase of 39 million over the last 10 years. In other words, real estate stock shows a compounding growth of 4.5 % per annum as against the growth rate of 2.8% in urban population. Obviously, such massive growth needs adequate support from infrastructure.

However, the state of affairs with infrastructure in Indian cities is not very encouraging. Most of the cities still have to deal with issues in terms of roads, public transportation, sanitation, storm water drainage, solid waste management systems, etc. on a regular basis. With the volume of real estate stock increasing inexorably in the cities, there is an acute problem with the basic needs like energy and water in the store for urban India.

The private sector contributes most of the development of real estate stock; however, the responsibility of infrastructure development lies squarely with public sector entities such as ULBs and other utility companies – most of which are Government agencies. The investment pattern in our cities shows a similar trend – the private sector invests in the development of real estate stocks, while the public sector invests largely into infrastructure development.

The quantum of investments in most infrastructure projects is huge, and the agencies responsible for its development are seriously under-financed. They depend either on domestic grants like JNNURM or on intercalation financing involving bilateral and multilateral agencies. In some instances, funds are mobilized from private sources in the form of Public Private Partnership. The private sector generally tends to shy away from investments into city-level infrastructure projects, as most of these projects are considered non-remunerative. They prefer to focus on investing into the development of real estate stock.

Mumbai, India’s financial capital attracts massive investments – largely in the real estate sector. The city being the nation’s epitome of high real estate prices and land scarcity, huge sum of money keep chasing land in the city – while infrastructure augmentation lags behind. Way behind.

Realty Sector Urges FM To Revisit Budget

The urban development ministry aims to seek a review of the proposal to get the service tax duty on sale of housing projects under construction which had been proposed in budget 2010 from April 1, 2010.

Delhi Properties - Real Estate India - Unitech Verve
Photo by nancyarora2020
The urban development Minister Mr. S Jaipal Reddy said at the national conference on Indian Real Estate “The urban development ministry feels the proposal of service tax needs review. I am recommending the review of the proposal. I think the real estate sector in India is not in pink of health right now and we cannot afford to add pressure on that,” he said, adding that suggestions would be made to the finance minister in the next few days.

The conference on Indian real estate was held by Associated Chambers of Commerce and Industry of India ( ASSOCHAM ) on Friday, March 26.

Realty sector has suffered the most after the global meltdown started in September 2008 and has just started to witness marginal pick up in demand. Real estate players are already pushing the government to withdraw the service tax imposed on the housing sector (at 3.3%, with abatement), as it would dampen the buyers.

“This is not the right time for service tax implementation as the government’s objective is to encourage people to own houses. We have to wait for another month or so to see if the finance ministry listens to our request,” told KP Singh, Chairman, DLF Group.

Mr. Reddy said that the government wants “vertical growth” of cities contrary to urban sprawl due to shortage of land and a more flexible floor-area-ratio (FAR) regime. A high FAR limit will allow more storeys’s to be built in the houses.

He quoted a report from the UN Habitat which showed, by 2050, 1 billion people of India will be living in cities. Reddy said to the reporters “ Urbanization is not only inevitable but also desirable,”  but further added that urban development has been a subject of “benign neglect” over the years as the issue fell in the domain of the state governments.”

Another suitable point that has been an issue for real estate companies is the number of clearances one has to take for the beginning of any project. “Today, there are more than 50 agencies from where we have to take our clearances. We have to ensure that the best way forward is to have a single window system as it would not only save time, but also ensure transparency,” said MD, Raheja Developers Ltd, Mr. Navin M Raheja.

“It is very important to have a single window clearance system in real estate sector,” put forward Anil K. Agarwal, Past President of Assocham.

All we have to wait for is the finance minister’s stand.